The God of Endings is a book that’s sticking with me long after its end. It’s been a while since I’ve had a story hang around like this; not overtly demanding I notice it and pay attention, not creating a sense of unfinished business or dissatisfaction with how things went, but rather quietly mulling over the questions it raises. I’ll get to those questions shortly.

But first: The God of Endings is the story of Collette LeSange. In 1984, the young-looking artist runs a prestigious arts preschool at a large manor in New York. But her youthful appearance hides her secret: she is immortal. As such, she must still interact with the world while also avoiding a life that will inevitably lead to suspicious questions about why she never seems to age. Likewise, bitter experience has taught her to fear the endings of anyone with whom she becomes close. Though she cannot speak definitely to the existence of a god or gods, Czernobog (the Serbian titular god of endings) lurks in the background of her never-ending life. And whenever she seems to have found a way to create a home, a family, a community, he comes roaring in to remind her that while she cannot end, everything else can – and will.
Thus her school for preschoolers: children who rush in bursting with life and joy and then just as quickly rush out, presumably to continue to grow, age, and die, but who for Collette will always remain young and alive. She can love from a distance, revel in the moment, but it will never last long enough for parents to notice anything odd about the teacher (at least, nothing that can’t be explained away as “artistic eccentricities”) and never long enough to gain Czernobog’s attention. Or so she hoped. But then a young gifted child arrives at her school and her carefully tended fences begin to crumble.

Author Jacqueline Holland takes us through the beauty and the horror of life, deftly juxtaposing Collette’s life in 1984 with stories of her past. The irony of the headstone carver’s daughter who took comfort in the idea of death finding herself denied that ending is a wonderful setup.
Though the word is never used, Collette is a vampire. (Hence the delightful choice of last name in her latest iteration.) Her grandfather, whom she had never met, comes to take her after her family dies in a plague and, without discussing it, turns her into an immortal being like himself. In a brief discussion after her rebirth, he tells her:
‘This world, my dear child, all of it, right to the very end if there is to be an end, is a gift. But it’s a gift few are strong enough to receive. I made a judgment that you might be among those strong few, that you might be better served on this side of things than the other. I thought you might find some use for the world, and it for you.’
He looked up at the moon, patted my shoulder almost absently, and said, ‘But if not, my sincerest apologies for the miscalculation.’
And it was this exchange, right at the beginning, that spoke to something with which I’ve been struggling for over sixteen years now: how selfish is it to bring children into this world? I have two children and the intensity of that question waxes and wanes, but is most definitely now in a waxing stage as I look at the world around us. What have I brought them into? On what precipice of an ending do we now stand? They didn’t ask for this – who am I to inflict it upon them? And yet, this world, these lives, truly can be a gift as well. Collette’s struggle to decide whether her grandfather did indeed miscalculate will stay with me for quite some time.




